![]() ![]() The current state-of- the-art effectively forces scholars to choose between a preconceived judgment of the significance of textual differences (the Lachmannian or neo-Lachmannian approach, and the weighted phylogenetic approach) or to make no judgment at all (the unweighted phylogenetic approach). Although there is great value in computationally assisted stemmatology, providing as it does a reproducible result and allowing access to the relevant methodological process in related fields such as evolutionary biology, computational stemmatics is not without its critics. Robinson and O’Hara 1996 Salemans 2000 Heikkila ¨ 2005 Windram et al. Many scholars already take stemmatic approaches that rely heavily on computational analysis of the collated text (e.g. Abstract Stemmatology, or the reconstruction of the transmission history of texts, is a field that stands particularly to gain from digital methods. Andrews and Caroline Mace ´ KU Leuven, Belgium. Source: | downloaded: Beyond the tree of texts: Building an empirical model of scribal variation through graph analysis of texts and stemmata. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |